Tyranny of consistency, design manager’s toolkit, when to use dialog boxes

Search for a command to run...

No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers. The change we’re discussing here is not a revolution, just an evolution. It’s simply a change in how many roles will be needed and what they will entail. Jorge Arango recently wrote that ...
The 10th (and final?) edition of The State of UX report by the UX Collective is here: a critical look at our industry based on more than 1k articles published and shared with our 500k+ subscribers in 2024. Things have been feeling differently for a ...
Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers. “We may be in the middle of one now, a period of change and awakening. And like previous periods of same, there are so many things to be currently worried about — potential authoritariani...
Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers. “Having recently changed my day job, I have had a lot of contact with the tools and practices of hiring: the majority of the aforementioned, alongside the treatment of candidates, has bee...
Weekly curated resources for designers — thinkers and makers. “You are Jean-Claude Van Damme. You’re straddling two 18-wheelers careening through space while doing the splits. It’s very difficult, your groin hurts, and you could really use a strawbe...
UX Collective
151 posts
“Current AI systems seek to mitigate AI mistakes by requiring human oversight, by keeping the human in the loop and relying on them to detect and fix the AI output if needed.
If an AI, like ChatGPT, is right most of the time, it is really hard as a human to judge if it is right or wrong in a particular case. And just adding a small disclaimer pointing out that the AI “may produce inaccurate information,” as done by ChatGPT apparently doesn’t prevent people from falling for the AI’s hallucinations. It also puts the human in the unpleasant position of taking all responsibility for an output or action that was mainly determined by the AI.”
Designing for safe and trustworthy AI →By Cara Storath
What happens when usability is no longer a priority? →[Sponsored] “I’m starting to think that some designers are just being lazy. A failure to test is undoubtedly a part of the problem, but I don’t think it’s just that. I believe there is a lack of education and awareness. (…) With new technology will come new interaction paradigms and modalities. Importantly, we must not see innovation and usability as a dichotomy.”
The UX Collective is an independent design publication that elevates unheard design voices and illuminates the path to design mastery and critical thinking. Here’s how we’re boosting stories through our partnership with Medium.
Internet Artifacts: you may touch the artifacts →
Hey Siri: call an ambulance →By Michalina Bidzinska
Why are we so fascinated by letters? →By Peter Cho
How effective are tobacco warning labels? →
By Elvis Hsiao
If you find our content helpful, here’s how you can support it:

Tyranny of consistency, design manager’s toolkit, when to use dialog boxes was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.